St. Moritz Home Page Our Company St. Moritz Divisions Associations and Memberships Employment Opportunities with St. Moritz Contact St. Moritz
 
 
Security Newsletters    Safety Committee    Upcoming Events/Tradeshows
   
 

 

St. Moritz News

 
     
   
     
 

About St. Moritz Security

Contact Us

St. Moritz Security Briefs

Volume 3, Issue 7

 

May 2007  

Six Tips for Successful Video Implementation in K-12 Schools:

Report: Schools Fall Short in Preparing for Emergencies

10 Ways To Get A Grip On Your e-mail

Is Web-Screening Job Candidates a Good Idea?

Six Tips for Successful Video Implementation in K-12 Schools:

Increasingly serious threats are emerging both inside and outside school walls, so here are six tips for achieving successful video implementation in K-12 schools:

Take advantage of the power of IP
Video technology today is like other network devices and applications that run on the existing IT network. IP cameras are another peripheral on the network, and video management software can be operated from a PC, making video easier to install, scale, access, share and use.

Get the right people involved
A cross-functional implementation team for video planning and deployment can decrease errors and ensure buy-in among critical system users. The team should include the principal, administrators, safety officers, IT professionals, teachers and athletic and transportation directors.

Capture the right video
The implementation team should consider the problems they are trying to address and prioritize coverage areas to provide the greatest possible breadth of information. Planning should consider a history of problems in the building and which areas are most frequently associated with activities such as fights, vandalism, drug use and sneak-offs. Consider entry and exit doors; high traffic, public areas; loading and unloading areas for buses; corners and stairwells; restroom entrances/exits; and parking lots.

Establish a policy
Schools should anticipate negative reaction to the use of video and construct an official policy outlining its use. The policy should communicate why administrators chose to use surveillance technology and list general guidelines and restrictions of surveillance video. Developing and proactively communicating a plan can address concerns and garner support.

Leverage video with other systems
IP video is unique in its ability to augment other systems. With access control, for example, administrators can use video to determine if main entrances are being kept locked during in-class hours, thus forcing visitors to check in at the office. Video can also identify - and suggest the need for training related to - issues such as tailgating, door propping and other activities that may render access control systems ineffective.

Provide access to law enforcement
For video to become a lifesaving tool, law enforcement and firefighters should have a link via a Web browser to provide access to live video from cameras on campus. The school may choose to offer full access to camera views any time, any place, or to offer video access only in case of an emergency. Either choice involves working through the school's IT administrator and security personnel.

From an article written by Andrew Wren & Brad Spicer (02/07)

top

Report: Schools Fall Short in Preparing for Emergencies

The Government Accountability Office (GAO) has analyzed the state of emergency preparedness at U.S. schools and concluded that schools' emergency plans are insufficient. The GAO finds, for example, that roughly 50 percent of all school districts lack a plan for educating students in the event that schools are closed for a long time. Districts are also failing to include first responders when implementing their emergency plans, and 28 percent of districts with emergency plans do not have plans for evacuating disabled students. Also, about 66 percent of districts are hampered by a lack of preparedness knowledge and equipment, including communications equipment and good locks for their buildings.

Source: CNN.com (05/17/07)

top

10 Ways To Get A Grip On Your e-mail

If you get and send 100 e-mails a day, that adds up to 24,000 messages annually, on which you probably spend an average of 100 workdays. If you could manage to reduce the amount of e-mail you send and receive by 20%, you'd free up 20 workdays a year to use for other things, like thinking up new ideas that could help further your career or, heck, taking a longer vacation.

So how can you cut back on the time e-mail takes up (not to mention the aggravation it can cause)? Ten suggestions that may help:

Send less
Think hard before you use the "reply to all" and "cc" features, and use group distribution lists sparingly. By targeting your e-mails, rather than spraying them, you'll be more efficient and effective.

Quit boomeranging
Send 5 e-mails and you'll get, on average, 3 responses, most of which aren't necessary. If you eliminate just 1 in 5 of your outgoing e-mails, you'll instantly shrink the incoming volume, and save time on needless back-and-forth exchanges.

Stop - then send
Before hitting the "send" button, ask yourself: Is this information timely, topical, and targeted? Will it help the recipient do his or her job better? If not, skip it.

Be polite, up to a point
Not every e-mail requires a reply, especially if it's just a routine "thanks!" With the people you e-mail (and who e-mail you) most often, try including an acronym in the subject line like "NTN" (no thanks needed) or "NRN" (no reply needed) - a simple but effective time-saver.

Schedule live conversations
Instead of sending an e-mail that will initiate a long back-and-forth discussion, try scheduling an in-person or phone meeting instead. You'll often get a lot more done in less time.

Strengthen your subject lines
Vague subject lines confuse recipients and make e-mails hard to locate later. One-word categories, like "Request" or "Confirmation," along with relevant information like dates or times, add clarity and context to your messages.

Structure matters
Avoid sending a wall of words. Instead, start every message with a greeting of no more than 8 words. (For example: "That was an interesting meeting yesterday.") Then use the ABC method to divide your e-mail into 3 distinct sections: Action (stating your purpose), Background (presenting your key points), and Close (clarifying the next steps).

Save purposefully
Searching for an old e-mail can eat up untold amounts of time, so be picky about what you save. Ask yourself: What are the odds I'll need this information later? Could I get it just as easily from the Web or somewhere else? Is it important to what I'm working on - really? You'll save less and find more.

File smart
You might have several overlapping e-mail folders, so "Stuff from the Boss" could contain anything from a performance review to a lunch invitation. Instead, create a smaller number of folders and label them according to content (not sender or some other criterion). You'll file and find information faster.

Coach - or suffer
Alas, sending better e-mails yourself won't guarantee that others will follow your lead, unless you ask them to. "Offer your frequent senders a few really good tips," the authors write, "or suffer through their bad e-mails."

From an article written by Anne Fisher, Fortune senior writer (05/18/07)

top


Quote of the Month:
"Many fine things can be done in a day if you don't always make that day tomorrow"


Is Web-Screening Job Candidates a Good Idea?

Using the Internet to examine job candidates is legal if done correctly, but employers should note that their findings may range from irrelevant to inaccurate. A recent survey found that of the 26 percent of employers who reported using search engines like Google, 51 percent reported not hiring applicants based on what was found. Of the 12 percent of employers who searched social networks like MySpace, 63 percent declined to hire candidates. Employers were put off by negative information like poor communication skills and false qualifications. On the flip side, 64 percent of employers found information confirming the suitability of the candidate. An employer's right to deny job candidates based on Internet search findings depends on the findings' content. Some states bar employers from taking punitive action against employees or job candidates due to off-duty activities or speech. Moreover, discriminatory googling, such as by national origin, may lead to lawsuits. Googling only one candidate out of a pool of applications is also frowned upon. One expert notes that, overall, time spent searching online may be better put to use questioning the applicant's former employers.

Source: Managing Accounts Payable (04/07) Vol. 2007, No. 4

top


Fact of the Month:
In April, internet news sites paid up to 9 cents a click to for search engine terms such as "VT shooting" and "VT video" to guarantee that their pages would be displayed prominently when readers searched for coverage of the Virginia Tech shootings. (The Wall Street Journal)


 
     
     
  top  
     
 
 

HomeCompanyDivisionsNews Room & EventsAssociationsEmploymentContact UsPrivacy Statement

 

designed and maintained
by DennisHamilton.NET, Inc.


CORPORATE OFFICE
St. Moritz Security Services, Inc.
4600 Clairton Boulevard
Pittsburgh, PA 15236


email stmoritz@smssi.com
Phone: 800.218.9156
Fax: 412.885.3740